Surgical treatment of hydrocephalus

From WikiLectures

Hydrocephalus (HC) is a term for abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the ventricles of the brain . As a result, the surrounding brain tissue can be oppressed.

A more detailed classification, causes and symptomatology of HC can be found on the hydrocephalus page.

HC can be treated surgically in three basic ways:

  1. drainage,
  2. by removing the obstruction (in the case of obstructive HC, most often it is a tumor),
  3. endoskopically [1].


This page presents the basic types of drainage and the endoscopic method in the form of ventriculostomy of the III. chamber. The solution of obstructive HC (removal of specific obstruction) is described individually in individual chapters of neurosurgery.

Diagnostics[edit | edit source]

  • CTthe first choice, depending on the type of HC, pathologies can be visualized (ventricular dilatation, origin of obstruction, etc.)
  • MRI – compared to CT, T2 MRI has the advantage in particular, on which CSF can be visualized ( fluid-sensitive T2)
  • ultrasound – especially in infants and younger pediatric patients;
  • LIT (lumbar infusion test) – detection of CSF resorption disorders, performed mainly in patients with normotensive hydrocephalus (NHP);
  • LD (lumbar drainage) – serves to determine the patient's response to drainage and to evaluate subsequent treatment procedures (mainly before the definitive application of a VP shunt in NHP patients) [2][3].

Classification of drainage treatment[edit | edit source]

Surgical treatment of HC drainage directly depends on the given type of hydrocephalus:

  1. in the case of acute HC, temporary drainage is indicated
  2. in the case of chronic HC, the goal of treatment is long-term drainage


Table summarizing the individual types of drainage in terms of duration of drainage treatment:

Type of treatment Temporary Long term
Type of drainage external ventricular drainage ventriculoperitoneal drainage
external lumbar drainage ventriculoatrial drainage
ventriculosubgaleal drainage lumboperitoneal drainage

Treatment of acute hydrocephalus[edit | edit source]

In the case of acute HC , depending on the patient's individual predispositions, temporary drainage may be indicated. It is most often ventricular or lumbar drainage, or ventriculosubgaleal drainage.

External ventricular drainage

External ventricular drainage[edit | edit source]

External ventricular drainage (EVD – external ventricular drain ) is used mainly in the case of acute obstructive HC , in which there is a clear limitation of the flow of CSF in the CSF channels[4]. From the lateral ventricle of the non-dominant hemisphere, the CSF is drained into the reservoir.

Indication[edit | edit source]

Indications for the application of EVD (it does not always have to be only acute HC) are:

  1. reduction of intracranial pressure (eg, acute hydrocephalus, craniotrauma)
  2. drainage of inflammatory CSF (CNS infection – the reason is the prevention of post-inflammatory obstructive HC, or the emergence of acute obstruction of the outlet tracts);
  3. drainage of bloody CSF (most often after bleeding or surgery (post-hemorrhagic HC), again we want to prevent the risk of obstructive HC or acute obstruction of the drainage channels);
  4. diversion of the natural flow of CSF (most often in the healing of wounds in the region of the posterior fossa)  . [5]
EVD can also be used perioperatively. It is thus indicated in the case of the need to achieve decompression in brain operations (especially in surgical resections of lesions in the posterior fossa area).

External lumbar drainage[edit | edit source]

In addition to diagnostic use, external lumbar drainage (LD – lumbar drain ) is also used in the treatment of acute communicating HC. The cerebrospinal fluid is drained from the lumbar section of the spine and, as in the case of EVD, is drained into a reservoir. It is applied between L3–L5. [6][7]

Indication[edit | edit source]

The indications are very similar compared to EVD, the decision to choose the type of drainage is directly proportional to the individual symptoms and comorbidities of individual patients:

  1. reduction of intracranial pressure;
  2. drainage of inflammatory CSF;
  3. drainage of bloody CSF;
  4. diverting the natural flow of CSF [8]


LD, like EVD, can also be used perioperatively to achieve decompression in brain operations (most often in resections of lesions in the posterior fossa, brainstem). In certain cases, it is applied for liquefaction , which can arise as a postoperative complication in case of incomplete closure of the dura, etc., and if a total revision of the wound is not necessary.

Ventriculosubgaleal drainage[edit | edit source]

This type of drainage is similar to external ventricular drainage, as in this case too the CSF is drained from the lateral ventricle of the non-dominant hemisphere. This time, however, the cerebrospinal fluid is not drained into a reservoir, but into a pocket created in the subgaleal space of the head . There, the resorption of cerebrospinal fluid occurs, or it can be punctured .[9]

Complications[edit | edit source]

The most common complications of drainage treatment include:

  • bleeding [10],
  • infection,
  • mechanical complications of drainage,
  • system overdrainage,
  • surgical complications – drainage malposition, epidural hematoma, etc. [11][12]

Treatment of chronic hydrocephalus[edit | edit source]

Even in the case of treatment of chronic hydrocephalus, surgery is indicated based on the individual presentation of the patients. It is not a rule that every chronic hydrocephalus must be treated surgically. Treatment of chronic HC is long-term.

Ventriculostomy of the III. chamber[edit | edit source]

It is a neuroendoscopic creation of an opening in the base of III. ventricle , is a solution to obstructive HC (some authors mention the possibility of applying ventriculostomy of the III. ventricle also in other types of hydrocephalus, but this is not usual). [13]

Technique[edit | edit source]

A cerebrotomy is performed near the coronal suture , the endoscope is introduced through the lateral ventricle into the III. chambers. As a result of HC, the foramen intraventriculare widens , so it is possible to revise the base III. ventricles and perforation of the arachnoid membrane. Monopolar electrocoagulation is used for perforation.[14]

The subsequent dilation of the opening is important, so that it does not close due to tissue regeneration. We achieve the possibility of CSF circulation through III. chamber into the interpeduncular cisterns at the base, through the hole in the base of III. ventricles it is possible to see a. basilaris. [15]

Principle[edit | edit source]

The principle is to re-enable the circulation of CSF , which was limited as a result of the obstruction.

Indication[edit | edit source]

Ventriculostomy is primarily III. chambers applied for a specific obstructive HC, which arose as a secondary consequence of, for example:

Benefits[edit | edit source]

For example:

  • effective causal treatment
  • unlike a shunt, the patient is not at risk of valve dysfunction
Cons[edit | edit source]

Disadvantages of the III. ventriculostomy can be divided into two basic points:

  • high risk of complications (both morbidity and mortality)
  • invasive procedure

Shunt[edit | edit source]

Long-term drainage, the principle of which is the implantation of two catheters together with a valve that regulates the circulation of CSF. Excessive CSF in the cerebral ventricles , or in the lumbar part of the spine, it is diverted by means of a shunt to another part of the body, where the CSF is allowed to be absorbed.

Valve Requirements[edit | edit source]
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

The valve must respond to opening pressure and must be one-way. The flow of CSF is regulated according to the setting of the opening pressure of the valve, which has different values. According to the values ​​of the opening pressure, we divide the valves into high-pressure, medium-pressure and low-pressure. [19]

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VP shunt)[edit | edit source]

CSF is drained into the peritoneal cavity via a catheter leading from the lateral chamber further under the skin.

It is the most frequently applied shunt [20][21].

Ventriculoatrial shunt (VA shunt)[edit | edit source]

CSF is drained from the lateral ventricles by the venous system into the atrium dextrum.

CT - Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

It is not as common as a VP shunt, it depends on the individual disposition of the patient and his comorbidities – it is often indicated for a VA shunt due to contraindications or a previous unsuccessful application of a VP shunt.

Lumboperitoneal shunt (LP shunt)[edit | edit source]

CSF is drained from the dural sac (subarachnoid space) in the area of ​​the lumbar spine into the peritoneal cavity. The catheter is inserted below the level of the L2 vertebra.

In addition to the mentioned three types of shunts, there are others, e.g. ventriculopleural shunts (VPL shunt) etc. [22]

Ventriculocisternal shunt (Torkildsen shunt)[edit | edit source]

Using an implanted catheter, CSF is drained from the lateral ventricle into the cerebellomedullary cistern [23][24].

Complications[edit | edit source]

As in the case of the treatment of acute HC, drainage treatment in the similar application of shunts is accompanied by a spectrum of possible complications:

  • infection – (up to 15%) most often Staphylococcus epidermidis, ventriculitis, meningitis;
  • shunt failure – obstruction, kinking of the catheter (most often in the neck area), etc.
  • distal complications– peritoneal pseudocysts, pleural effusion (primarily in ventriculopleural shunts) [25][26][27]

Links[edit | edit source]

Related articles[edit | edit source]

External links[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. ASCHOFF, A. – KREMER, Paul – HASHEMI, Bahram. The scientific history of hydrocephalus and its treatment. Neurosurgical Review. 1999, y. 2-3, p. 67-93, ISSN 0344-5607. DOI: 10.1007/s101430050035.
  2. GREITZ, Dan. Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: new theories and implications for therapy. Neurosurgical Review. 2004, y. 3, p. ?, ISSN 0344-5607. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-004-0326-9.
  3. GRAFF-RADFORD, Neill R – JONES, David T. Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Continuum Minneap Minn [online]2019, y. ?, no. 1, p. 165-186, Available from <https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000689>. ISSN 1080-2371 (print), 1538-6899. 
  4. sc
  5. FRIED, Herbert I. – NATHAN, Barnett R. – ROWE, A. Shaun. The Insertion and Management of External Ventricular Drains: An Evidence-Based Consensus Statement. Neurocritical Care. 2016, y. 1, p. 61-81, ISSN 1541-6933. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-015-0224-8.
  6. DOUBI, Aseel – ALJOMAH, Dana – ALHARGAN, Alanood. The Effect of lumbar drains on spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak repair. Neurosciences. 2018, y. 4, p. 281-285, ISSN 1319-6138. DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2018.4.20180116.
  7. GANTI, Latha. External Ventricular Drain Placement. Atlas of Emergency Medicine Procedures. 2016, y. ?, p. 241-245, ISSN ?. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2507-0_40.
  8. MOZA, Kapil – MCMENOMEY, Sean O. – DELASHAW, Johnny B.. Indications for Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage and Avoidance of Complications. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2005, y. 4, p. 577-582, ISSN 0030-6665. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2005.01.001.
  9. KUO, Meng-Fai. Surgical management of intraventricular hemorrhage and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in premature infants. Biomedical Journal. 2020, y. 3, p. 268-276, ISSN 2319-4170. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.03.006.
  10. BAUER, David F – RAZDAN, Shantanu N – BARTOLUCCI, Alfred A. Meta-Analysis of Hemorrhagic Complications From Ventriculostomy Placement by Neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery. 2011, y. 2, p. 255-260, ISSN 0148-396X. DOI: 10.1227/neu.0b013e31821a45ba.
  11. MURALIDHARAN, Rajanandini. External ventricular drains: Management and complications. Surgical Neurology International. 2015, y. 7, p. 271, ISSN 2152-7806. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.157620.
  12. DOUBI, Aseel – ALJOMAH, Dana – ALHARGAN, Alanood. The Effect of lumbar drains on spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak repair. Neurosciences. 2018, y. 4, p. 281-285, ISSN 1319-6138. DOI: 10.17712/nsj.2018.4.20180116.
  13. ALGIN, Oktay – UCAR, Murat – OZMEN, Evrim. Assessment of third ventriculostomy patency with the 3D-SPACE technique: a preliminary multicenter research study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015, y. 6, p. 1347-1355, ISSN 0022-3085. DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.jns14298.
  14. STACHURA, Krzysztof – GRZYWNA, Ewelina – KWINTA, Borys M.. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy – effectiveness of the procedure for obstructive hydrocephalus with different etiology in adults. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques. 2014, y. ?, p. 586-595, ISSN 1895-4588. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.46076.
  15. YADAV, Yad Ram – PARIHAR, Vijay – PANDE, Sonjjay. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2012, y. 02, p. 163-173, ISSN 0976-3147. DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.98222.
  16. CINALLI, Giuseppe – SPENNATO, Pietro – NASTRO, Anna. Hydrocephalus in aqueductal stenosis. Child's Nervous System. 2011, y. 10, p. 1621-1642, ISSN 0256-7040. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-011-1546-2.
  17. SPENNATO, Pietro – MIRONE, Giuseppe – NASTRO, Anna. Hydrocephalus in Dandy–Walker malformation. Child's Nervous System. 2011, y. 10, p. 1665-1681, ISSN 0256-7040. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-011-1544-4.
  18. MARX, Sascha – REINFELDER, Maresa – MATTHES, Marc. Frequency and treatment of hydrocephalus prior to and after posterior fossa tumor surgery in adult patients. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2018, y. 5, p. 1063-1071, ISSN 0001-6268. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-018-3496-x.
  19. KUO, Meng-Fai. Surgical management of intraventricular hemorrhage and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in premature infants. Biomedical Journal. 2020, y. 3, p. 268-276, ISSN 2319-4170. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.03.006.
  20. CHOUDHURY, Subhasis Roy. Hydrocephalus. Pediatric Surgery. 2018, y. ?, p. 55-59, ISSN ?. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6304-6_9.
  21. MAZZOLA, Catherine A. – CHOUDHRI, Asim F. – AUGUSTE, Kurtis I.. Pediatric hydrocephalus: systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 2: Management of posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in premature infants. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2014, y. Supplement_1, p. 8-23, ISSN 1933-0707. DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.peds14322.
  22. ROBLES, Luis A. – MESSINA-LOPEZ, Mario. Spontaneous Extrusion of Ventriculopleural Shunt Catheter Associated with Pleural Effusion. World Neurosurgery. 2020, y. ?, p. 4-6, ISSN 1878-8750. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.208.
  23. FOX, John L. – AL-MEFTY, Ossama. Percutaneous ventriculocisternal shunt. Technical note. Surgical Neurology. 1985, y. 2, p. 184-186, ISSN 0090-3019. DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(85)90183-1.
  24. CANBOLAT, A. – ÖNAL, Ç. – HEPGÜL, K.. A new ventriculocisternal shunt technique in treatment of noncommunicating hydrocephalus: A technical note with a brief discussion of the literature. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1996, y. 4, p. 466-469, ISSN 0001-6268. DOI: 10.1007/bf01420310.
  25. GOESER, C D – MCLEARY, M S – YOUNG, L W. Diagnostic imaging of ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunctions and complications.. RadioGraphics. 1998, y. 3, p. 635-651, ISSN 0271-5333. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.18.3.9599388.
  26. KALE, H.A. – MUTHUKRISHNAN, A. – HEGDE, S.V.. Intracranial Perishunt Catheter Fluid Collections with Edema, a Sign of Shunt Malfunction: Correlation of CT/MRI and Nuclear Medicine Findings. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2017, y. 9, p. 1754-1757, ISSN 0195-6108. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5291.
  27. STARREVELD, Y – POENARU, D – ELLIS, P. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt knot: a rare cause of bowel obstruction and ischemia. Can J Surg [online]1998, y. ?, no. 3, p. 239-40, Available from <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950169/?tool=pubmed>. ISSN 0008-428X.